JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 4, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Cesar Augusto Salazar Cano Vs. Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca, Seccion Tercera Subseccion B, El Juzgado 38 Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Superior De Bogota –Sala Civil. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca, Seccion Tercera Subseccion B
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Superintendencia Sin Personeria Juridica
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando dos autoridades judiciales son de distintas jurisdicciones y carecen de superior jerárquico común
Accion De Tutela Contra Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca
Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio
  • Entidad de orden nacional sin personería jurídica
  • Naturaleza jurídica
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. UNICO: REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el senor Cesar Augusto Salazar Cano contra la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Tercera, Subseccion B, para adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.